<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Raid Recovery Tips &#187; raid overhead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/tag/raid-overhead/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.raidrecoverytips.org</link>
	<description>Tips about Raid 0, Raid 1, Raid 5, Raid 6, Raid Software, Raid Controller, Linux Raid...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:25:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Defining Disk Space</title>
		<link>http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/defining-disk-space.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/defining-disk-space.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Raid Configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disk space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid overhead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/defining-disk-space.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A comparison of usable drive space to physical disk drive capacity. </p>
<p><b>Overview:</b> There are two main factors affecting your total system storage capacity:</p>
<ul>
<li>RAID Overhead </li>
<li>Conversion between Binary and Decimal Byte “Equivalents” </li>
</ul>
<p>In some cases, the overhead is 50% of the total hard drive capacity. </p>
<p><b>Comparing Binary and Decimal Equivalents:</b></p>
<p><b>The following Table charts common Binary/Decimal Values:</b></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image2.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image_thumb2.png" width="244" height="53" /></a> </p>
<p><b>RAID Overhead:</b>    <br />With Raid 1 (Mirror) or Raid 5 (Strip Set with Parity), a certain portion of the disk space will be used for redundancy thus it will not show up as usable space.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image3.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image_thumb3.png" width="244" height="54" /></a>
</p>
<p><b>Example of NAS 6000 Capacity Calculations:</b>    <br />The NAS 6000 base unit has twelve 160 GB hard&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A comparison of usable drive space to physical disk drive capacity. </p>
<p><b>Overview:</b> There are two main factors affecting your total system storage capacity:</p>
<ul>
<li>RAID Overhead </li>
<li>Conversion between Binary and Decimal Byte “Equivalents” </li>
</ul>
<p>In some cases, the overhead is 50% of the total hard drive capacity. </p>
<p><b>Comparing Binary and Decimal Equivalents:</b></p>
<p><b>The following Table charts common Binary/Decimal Values:</b></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image2.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image_thumb2.png" width="244" height="53" /></a> </p>
<p><b>RAID Overhead:</b>    <br />With Raid 1 (Mirror) or Raid 5 (Strip Set with Parity), a certain portion of the disk space will be used for redundancy thus it will not show up as usable space.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image3.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image_thumb3.png" width="244" height="54" /></a>
</p>
<p><b>Example of NAS 6000 Capacity Calculations:</b>    <br />The NAS 6000 base unit has twelve 160 GB hard disks. Intuitively one would expect to have a total of (12&#215;160GB) 1.92 TB storage space. Below is a calculation in Table 3 &amp; 4 to compare physical drive space to the usable disk space available with the Windows Operating System.</p>
<p><b>Table 3</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image4.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image_thumb4.png" width="244" height="85" /></a> </p>
<p>The above number representing the total number of bytes (characters) that can be stored on the hard drive. This is a decimal number, to convert this number to the decimal equivalent of the binary Megabytes (MB) or Gigabytes (GB), this value must be divided by the decimal value of a binary MB or GB. The decimal equivalent of 1 MB (220) is 1,048,576 and 1 GB (230) is 1,073,741,824.</p>
<p><b>Table 4 &#8211; Using the results from Table 3:</b></p>
<p> <a href="http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image5.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image_thumb5.png" width="244" height="95" /></a>
</p>
<p>The available user space reported by Windows is 1,512 GB on a base unit and 1,526 GB on an expansion unit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.raidrecoverytips.org/defining-disk-space.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

